SM4 Safety Newsletter  


Automation and Upset Recovery
by James Priest

With ongoing advances in aircraft automation, current and future pilots are becoming well versed in all aspects of technology on board modern aircraft. However, they may be lacking in certain aspects of airmanship and piloting technique as it relates to the correct and proper control of flight paths. When confronted with an unexpected upset, pursuing autoflight solutions when manual control is called for could potentially lead to negative outcomes.

Much has been written of late on pilots’ overdependence on automation. This is due in part to a few notable incidents where the pilot has improperly used autoflight systems or attempted to manage a fully automated airplane when manual pilot control was the correct course of action. While these events underscore that the problem is acute and current, regulators have been concerned about the issue for some time. The British Civil Aviation Authority published a report nearly 10 years ago concluding that current pilot training does not adequately prepare pilots to monitor the automated functions of the aircraft or teach pilots when to intervene. They recommended that there be a shift in emphasis in the way automation management is taught. The regulatory standards and methods for evaluating the appropriate knowledge required for the use of automation are significantly less well defined than those involved with verifying manual flying skills. The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) recently published similar guidance on proper use of automation and pilot training interventions to address training short falls.




James Priest
Engineering Test Pilot
Calspan



The need to better manage automation is illustrated in the published findings of an investigation into a 2012 Norwegian accident involving a Boeing 737. The aircraft was on approach and being flown fully automated. The pilots were unaware of a failure in the elevator hydraulic system and that the trim was running to compensate. Suddenly, the aircraft pitched nose up. The auto-thrust system initiated full power in an effort to maintain airspeed. The increase in thrust from the low-mounted engines further increased the pitch rate causing an even greater decrease in airspeed. When the pitch attitude reached 20 degrees nose-up, both pilots started pushing on the control column with a combined force in excess of 200 lbs in an attempt to recover. The pitch attitude eventually increased to nearly 40 degrees and the airspeed dropped below 120KIAS, the 1g stall speed. The stick shaker and stall warning actuated but fortunately, the aircraft did not stall because the wing was (properly) unloaded during recovery. The aircraft eventually landed safely. The board concluded that a buildup of deicing fluid caused the actuators to stick. Of particular note is that during the initial phase of the upset, no attempt was made to disengage the autopilot, auto-thrust system, or to trim nose-down manually. Additionally, the stick force applied didn’t cause the autopilot to automatically disconnect.

The above incident illustrates the difficulty pilots have in dealing with upsets when automation is involved. Ten years of FAA/NASA sponsored research into loss-of-control prevention and recovery has demonstrated that pilots tend to let the automation deal with an upset condition longer than they should. This may be due in part because they do not have a clear idea on a proper intervention.

All pilots have received in-flight unusual attitude recovery training sometime in their career. However, unless they have been trained in an in-flight simulation aircraft, none have accomplished real-world upset recovery. To ensure necessary proficiency in proper upset, recovery pilots must be trained to not only recover from extreme attitudes but also to understand transport aircraft aerodynamics, how various events might lead to an upset condition, and finally, how to adopt the necessary control strategy to sustain or regain controlled flight.

ABOUT CALSPAN

Calspan Corporation is a global leader in providing research and testing services in the aviation and transportation industries. The company’s headquarters in Buffalo, N.Y., house a variety of research and testing facilities, including a transonic wind tunnel, ground transportation vehicle crash testing, hyge sled testing and research, and tire research testing. Calspan Aerospace and Calspan Air Services operate at the Niagara Falls International Airport with a fleet of aircraft used as in-flight simulators and airborne testbeds. Calspan Aerospace also has facilities at Edwards Air Force Base in California, and Patuxent River, Md. The company provides a comprehensive Upset Recovery Training course, which includes actual in-flight simulators, to qualified Global Aerospace customers.

Sponsored in part by Global Aerospace and SM4 Safety Program. The ACSF Symposium is the annual gathering of the air charter industry where current and emerging safety challenges are investigated. SM4 Partner, Dr. Tony Kern, will be a featured presenter. For more information go to http://www.acsf.aero/symposium/

Upcoming 2014 Events

February 24-27—Heli-Expo 2014—Anaheim, CA—Booth #808

April 24—ORBAA Safety Day—Columbus, OH—Dr. Tony Kern, Convergent Performance LLC

April 27-30—RIMS 2014—Denver, CO—Booth #1573

May 6—NCBAA Safety Day—San Jose, CA—Ms. Sunshine McCarthy, Baldwin Aviation

October 21-23—NBAA 2014—Orlando, FL—Booth #TBD

Visit sm4.global-aero.com to view updates to the 2014 SM4 Safety Seminar Schedule.


 
RELATED ARTICLES:  
Could Technology Be a Hindrance to Your Operation? The True Meaning of Proficiency


When Jim Lara had a new up-to-date avionics suite installed in his Baron last December, he faced a task even more daunting than selecting, installing and paying for the glass cockpit components: learning how to operate them... Full Story


I had been on an extended break from the Navy reserves to train with a new airline. When I got back to Navy flying, I flew two long, round-trip C-130T missions to Hawaii in three months, but I had not participated in a pilot-training event in more... Full Story

ABOUT SM4     ARTICLES     EVENTS     CONTACT US

sm4.global-aero.com  |  safety@global-aero.com
Convergent Performance Fireside Partners